Actually, I agree. Nerfing the DPS is too heavy handed. Something has to be done, but this is probably not it. Every player who has a carrier and uses it just for PVP is screwed over by this. Same with players with supers. They too get screwed if they are just using it for PvP.

Your post is very muddled...on the one hand you are implying that because I am in GSF I am interested in only making ISK. On the other you are implying I hate drones and ratting even though I agree this nerf is probably not the right way to go regarding the flood of ISK flowing into the game and potential bad effects that could have.

Maybe you should sit down with an adult and have them help you figure things out.

so, one thing nobody seems to have touched yet:

why is there more money? maybe because people became "more productive".
just like in the real ******* world, where the available monetary supply has to be increased just
because society became more efficient and productive, because there is more stuff being built, faster and more cost effective.

yeah, and put npc sell orders at fixed prices for every item. and buff mission income.

did you even read what i wrote, that it all was about more isk SINKS to adjust the amount of money in the game?
i **** you no kiddo, it's like talking to a potted plant about the inner workings of a nuclear power plant -.-

It doesn't hit Goons the hardest, I promise you it's going to hit renting corps and start-up players trying to make their first couple of billions more than a massive, rich alliance with resources galore. It's the lower tier players that are going to be clobbered the most by this, no doubt.

That is the trick. Keep them from injecting too much ISK into the game and make them PVP viable. One draconian solution is just keep them out of the anomalies. Somebody else suggested a hull penalty when ratting (note the penalty could be to payouts not the ships functionality). I find both of these rather uninspiring, but probably better than what we have now.

First off if this applies to everyone it is taking a bad idea and compounding it and applying it to those who are not the problem. Second, the cap/diminishing return is not a one and done number. It will have to continuously monitored and changed regularly as players change in game behaviors. Look at my signature, the idea of getting it "just right" even with constant monitoring is going to be problematic. You'll know how much ISK has entered the system, but you won't necessarily know how much is going too, so your policy will always be looking backwards, not forwards. In other words, it assumes a degree of information that nobody possesses not even the Devs.

That problem is more along the lines of we need special sites that are designed for caps and regular anoms should prolly get gates. This way risk / reward can be balanced on the farming more easily.

the answer to this, at least for me is simple.

I am now unsubbed.

Post with your main or stfu ;)

Sorry...im late... was looking for another game...
Did we get any response from CCP?